Factors contributing to the Success of Aquaculture Field Schools

Authors

  • Gour Sundar Saha ICAR-CIFA, Bhubneswar
  • Himansu Kumar De ICAR-CIFA Bhubaneswar Odisha
  • Abhijit Sinha Mahapatra ICAR-CIFA, Bhubaneswar
  • Nirupama Panda ICAR-CIFA, Bhubaneswar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26725/JEE.2020.1.32.6441-6447

Keywords:

Aquaculture Field Schools, Factors, Farmer, Extension, Odisha, Chhattisgarh

Abstract

ICAR- Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture (CIFA) had piloted four Aquaculture Field Schools (AFS), a model of farmer to farmer extension, in Odisha and Chhattisgarh states in India. The AFS’ are attracting farmers and stakeholders as they provide a platform to share experience and enable cross learning. In this research, an attempt has been made to identify the factors that contribute to the successful performance of AFS. Data were collected from 166 user farmers, selected randomly from the list available with operators. Five variables viz., age of fish farmer, frequency of visit to AFS, duration of visit, interaction with the fellow farmers and advocation of advanced technologies of ICAR-CIFA to other farmers were observed to be significantly contributing to yield of fish. The Multiple correlation coefficient, R=0.48, indicated that there is a significant and positive correlation between the observed and predicted value of fish yield.

References

Braun, A.R, Thiele G & Fernández, M. (2000). Farmer Field Schools and Local Agricultural Research Committees: Complementary Platforms for Integrated Decision-Making in Sustainable Agriculture, AgREN Network Paper No. 105, London, UK: AgREN/ODI, pp. 16

De, H. K, Saha, G. S & Radheyshyam (2012). Training and sensitizing the farmers in fish farming through Aquaculture field School. Indian Farming, 62(2): 31-33.

De, H. K, Saha, G. S & Radheyshyam (2013). Aquaculture field schools to promote farmer to farmer extension. Journal of Global Communication 6(2): 77-85.

FAO. (2017). Sub-committee on Aquaculture - Extension for aquaculture development. Ninth Session Rome 24-27 Oct. 2017. COFI:AQ/IX/2017/7.

Minjauw, B., Muriuki, H.G., & Romney, D. (2002). Development of the Farmer Field School Methodology for Smallholder Dairy Farmers in Kenya. Paper presented at International Learning Workshop on Farmer Field Schools (FFS): Emerging Issues and Challenges, 21-25 October 2002, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Tu, N.V & Giang, T.T. (2002). Improving the Efficiency of Aquaculture Extension Activity in the Southeastern Provinces of Southern Vietnam. In: Edwards, P., Demaine, H. and Little, D.C. (Eds), Rural Aquaculture.Wallingford, UK: CABI Publication, pp. 285-300.

Watson, D.J. (2008). Community Farmer Field School Animal Health Facilitators:Hybridizing Private Animal Healthcare and Capacity Building in Remote Pastoralist Areas, Research Report 14, ILRI, Nairobi.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-13

How to Cite

Saha, G. S., De, H. K., Mahapatra, A. S., & Panda, N. (2020). Factors contributing to the Success of Aquaculture Field Schools. Journal of Extension Education, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.26725/JEE.2020.1.32.6441-6447